Restaurant Location Guide

Table of Contents
A strategic approach to site selection that balances visibility, accessibility, costs, and market potential
Location is consistently cited as the number one factor in restaurant success or failure. This guide provides a systematic framework for evaluating potential sites - covering demographic analysis, traffic patterns, occupancy cost benchmarks, lease considerations, and the regulatory requirements that can make or break your timeline. Whether you're opening your first restaurant or expanding an existing concept, these site selection principles help you make data-driven decisions rather than relying on gut instinct alone.
Choosing a restaurant location is one of the most consequential decisions you'll make as an operator. Unlike menu changes or staffing adjustments that can be corrected relatively quickly, your location locks you into a specific trade area, customer base, and cost structure for years. The right location creates built-in advantages - natural foot traffic, complementary neighboring businesses, and demographics aligned with your concept. The wrong location forces you to spend precious marketing dollars and operational energy overcoming structural disadvantages that a better site wouldn't have.
Industry experts consistently rank poor location selection among the top reasons restaurants close. According to location intelligence research from Kalibrate, an average of 91,500 restaurants closed annually between 2022 and 2024 - and location factors play a significant role in many of these closures. This isn't about finding the "perfect" location - that rarely exists. It's about understanding the tradeoffs inherent in any site and ensuring those tradeoffs align with your concept, budget, and operational capabilities.
One persistent myth deserves correction upfront: you may have heard that 60% or even 90% of restaurants fail in their first year. According to 2024 data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics analyzed by SCORE, 80.9% of restaurants actually survive their first year, and 51.4% survive five years. While restaurant failure rates are real, they're not as catastrophic as popular wisdom suggests - and many failures trace back to preventable location mistakes.
This guide walks you through a methodical approach to site selection. You'll learn how to define your trade area, analyze demographics, evaluate traffic patterns, understand occupancy cost benchmarks, navigate lease structures, and assess regulatory requirements. The goal isn't to eliminate risk - opening any restaurant carries inherent risk - but to ensure you're making location decisions based on data and strategic fit rather than emotion or convenience.
Understanding Your Target Market Before You Search
Before evaluating any specific location, you need clarity on who your customer is. Your concept dictates your ideal customer profile, and your ideal customer profile dictates where you should be looking. A fast-casual lunch concept targeting office workers has fundamentally different location requirements than a destination fine-dining restaurant or a family-friendly casual chain.
Demographic alignment is the foundation of site selection. This means understanding the age, income, household composition, and lifestyle characteristics of your target customer - then finding locations where those people live, work, or spend time. A breakfast and brunch concept needs residential density or weekend foot traffic. A quick-service restaurant near office buildings needs weekday lunch demand. A bar and late-night concept needs proximity to entertainment districts or residential areas with the right age demographics.
Psychographic factors matter as much as demographics. Two neighborhoods might have similar income levels but very different dining preferences. One might prioritize convenience and value while another seeks experiential dining and is willing to pay premium prices. Understanding these nuances helps you identify not just where your customers are, but whether they'll actually respond to your concept. Local market research - including competitive analysis and customer intercept surveys - provides insights that census data alone cannot.
Daypart analysis reveals when your location needs to generate traffic. If your concept relies on multiple dayparts (breakfast, lunch, and dinner), you need a location that draws different customer segments throughout the day. A site that's perfect for lunch might be dead after 6 PM if it's in a commercial district with no residential density or evening foot traffic generators nearby.
Trade Area Analysis and Customer Geography
Your trade area is the geographic region from which you'll draw the majority of your customers. Understanding trade area dynamics helps you evaluate whether a location can support your revenue requirements and how you'll compete with existing restaurants for market share. Research from Kalibrate and Maptive confirms that 85% of restaurant customers reside within 3 to 5 miles of the location - making trade area analysis essential.

Primary trade area typically encompasses customers who will visit regularly - often defined as a 5 to 10 minute drive time for casual and quick-service restaurants, or roughly a 1 to 3 mile radius depending on population density. In urban areas with strong public transit or walkability, this might shrink to a 10 to 15 minute walk. Your primary trade area should contain enough of your target customers to sustain your base business without requiring heavy marketing investment.
Secondary trade area extends beyond your primary zone and captures customers who might visit occasionally - perhaps for special occasions, when they're in the area for other reasons, or when specifically seeking out your concept. This zone typically extends 15 to 20 minutes drive time. While secondary customers won't drive your daily business, they contribute to overall volume and can become primary customers if you build strong brand loyalty.
Tertiary trade area includes destination diners - people who will travel specifically for your restaurant because of reputation, cuisine type, or experience. For most concepts, tertiary trade area revenue is minimal and shouldn't factor heavily into location decisions. However, for unique destination concepts or restaurants in tourist areas, this extended zone becomes more relevant.
| Trade Area Zone: | Typical Radius: | Customer Behavior: | Revenue Contribution: |
| Primary | 1-3 miles / 5-10 min drive | Regular visits, convenience-driven | 60-70% of revenue |
| Secondary | 3-7 miles / 10-20 min drive | Occasional visits, planned trips | 20-30% of revenue |
| Tertiary | 7+ miles / 20+ min drive | Destination visits, special occasions | 5-15% of revenue |
Population thresholds vary by concept and are highly location-dependent. Rather than relying on fixed population ratios, market feasibility depends on analyzing local demographics, per capita spending patterns, competitive density, and consumer behavior data. Modern site selection increasingly uses data-driven approaches based on actual customer movement patterns rather than simple radius models.
Evaluating Foot Traffic and Vehicle Counts
Traffic - both pedestrian and vehicular - directly correlates with visibility and convenience, two factors that heavily influence casual dining decisions. However, raw traffic counts don't tell the whole story. The quality and timing of traffic matters as much as the quantity.
Foot traffic analysis is essential for urban locations and walkable suburban districts. You want to understand not just how many people pass by, but who they are and when they're passing. Office workers at lunch have different needs than evening entertainment seekers or weekend shoppers. Spend time at potential locations during different dayparts and days of the week. Count pedestrians, observe demographics, and note what other businesses seem busy.
Vehicle traffic counts are available from local transportation departments and commercial real estate databases. Look for counts that reflect your operating hours, not just daily averages. A location on a major commuter route might show impressive daily traffic numbers, but if that traffic is rush-hour commuters who aren't stopping, those numbers don't translate to customers. Consider traffic direction as well - a site that's easy to access from one direction but requires a difficult turn from the other may only capture half the potential traffic.
Traffic speed and patterns affect stopping behavior. High-speed arterial roads make it difficult for drivers to notice your restaurant and make spontaneous decisions to pull in. Slower-moving streets, especially those with traffic signals that create natural stopping points, give potential customers time to notice your signage and make the decision to stop. Similarly, one-way streets or divided highways may limit access and reduce your effective capture rate.
Ingress and egress describes how easily customers can enter and exit your parking lot or building. Poor ingress and egress creates friction that discourages visits, especially for quick-service and fast-casual concepts where convenience is paramount. Evaluate sight lines from the road, turning movements required, and any traffic signals or medians that might affect access. A location with great visibility but difficult access will underperform its traffic counts.
Accessibility, Parking, and Physical Considerations
Physical accessibility encompasses more than just parking - it includes public transit access, walkability, delivery access, and ADA compliance. These factors affect both customer convenience and operational efficiency.
Parking requirements are determined by local zoning ordinances and vary significantly by jurisdiction. While there's no national standard, common industry benchmarks suggest one parking space per four seats for sit-down restaurants, or one space per 100 square feet of dining area for fast-food establishments. Quick-service and fast-casual restaurants in suburban areas typically need adequate parking to handle peak demand. In urban areas with strong public transit, parking requirements decrease but don't disappear entirely - you still need loading zones for deliveries and accommodations for customers with mobility limitations.
Shared parking arrangements can work well in mixed-use developments or shopping centers where different businesses have complementary peak times. A breakfast restaurant sharing parking with an office building may work perfectly since demand peaks don't overlap. However, be cautious about shared parking with businesses that have similar peak times - sharing a lot with another busy lunch restaurant means neither business has adequate parking when it matters most.
Public transit access becomes increasingly important as delivery apps expand and urban customers reduce car ownership. A location near subway stations, bus stops, or bike infrastructure expands your customer base beyond those willing to drive. Transit access also affects staffing - locations that are difficult to reach without a car limit your labor pool and may increase turnover as employees find jobs closer to home or transit lines.
Delivery and service access affects operational efficiency and costs. Restaurants need regular deliveries from food distributors, beverage companies, and other suppliers. A location with no loading zone or rear delivery access means deliveries happen through the front door, disrupting service and potentially violating health codes. Evaluate delivery access during site visits and confirm that your anticipated delivery schedule won't create conflicts with neighbors or landlord requirements.
ADA compliance isn't optional - the Americans with Disabilities Act requires accessible entry, restrooms, and seating. While landlords are generally responsible for common area compliance in multi-tenant buildings, you're responsible for ensuring your specific space meets requirements. Non-compliant spaces require modification before opening, adding to buildout costs and timeline.
Analyzing the Competitive Landscape
Competition analysis goes beyond counting how many restaurants are nearby. You need to understand the competitive dynamics of the market - who's succeeding, who's struggling, and whether there's an unmet demand your concept can capture. Research from Mapchise analyzing over 75,000 restaurant closures found that competitor density in the trade area is a key factor affecting closure rates.
Direct competitors serve similar cuisine at similar price points to similar customer segments. If you're opening a wood-fired pizza concept, every other pizza restaurant in the trade area is a direct competitor. Too many direct competitors in a trade area indicates market saturation - there simply may not be enough demand to support another similar concept. However, one or two successful direct competitors can actually be positive - it validates that demand exists and that the location works for your cuisine type.
Indirect competitors serve the same customer need through different means. For a quick-service lunch concept, indirect competitors include not just other quick-service restaurants but also fast-casual options, food trucks, grocery store prepared foods, and even meal delivery services. Understanding the full competitive picture helps you assess the true market opportunity and position your concept effectively.
Competitive clustering describes the tendency for similar businesses to locate near each other. This can be positive or negative depending on circumstances. A "restaurant row" creates a dining destination that draws customers who want options - your restaurant benefits from the overall traffic even if individual customers choose a competitor on any given visit. However, clustering only works when total demand exceeds total supply. Five burger restaurants on the same block will cannibalize each other unless that block draws exceptional traffic.
Concept gaps represent opportunities where customer demand exists but isn't being met by current options. Perhaps a neighborhood has plenty of casual dining but no upscale options. Or maybe there's strong lunch traffic but nowhere serves breakfast. Identifying concept gaps requires spending time in the area, talking to potential customers, and analyzing what's missing rather than just what's present. Successful restaurateurs often find locations by identifying underserved segments rather than competing head-to-head with established concepts.
Financial Considerations and Occupancy Costs
Location costs extend far beyond base rent. Understanding total occupancy cost and how it relates to revenue potential is critical for financial viability. A location that seems expensive might actually be cheaper on a per-customer basis than a "bargain" location with less traffic.
Rent as a percentage of sales is the key metric for evaluating location affordability. According to the National Restaurant Association's 2025 Restaurant Operations Data Abstract, based on a survey of over 900 operators nationwide, occupancy costs represented a median of 5.7% of sales for full-service restaurants and 5.2% for limited-service restaurants in 2024. Urban and city center locations averaged 6.0% of sales. Industry consultants at Paytronix recommend targeting 5% to 8% of yearly sales for rent, while The Fork CPAs advises keeping total occupancy cost between 6% and 8% of sales.
| Location Type: | Target Occupancy Cost (% of Sales): | Notes: |
| Standard locations | 5-8% | Sustainable long-term target (NRA/Paytronix) |
| Urban / City center | 6-8% | Higher costs offset by higher volume |
| Suburban | 5-6% | Lower costs, parking advantages |
| Small communities / Rural | 3-5% | Lower costs, smaller customer base |
| Critical threshold | 10% max | Exceeding creates cash flow problems |
Total occupancy cost includes more than rent. You must factor in common area maintenance (CAM) charges, property taxes (often passed through to tenants), insurance requirements, and utilities if not included in rent. According to Armitage Accounting, total occupancy costs (rent + CAM + taxes + utilities) should not exceed 10% of revenue. CAM charges in shopping centers typically add 15% to 25% on top of base rent. Property tax pass-throughs vary significantly by jurisdiction. A complete occupancy cost analysis considers all these factors, not just the headline rent number.
Lease structure affects cash flow beyond just the monthly payment. Triple-net (NNN) leases make you responsible for taxes, insurance, and maintenance in addition to base rent. Gross leases include these costs but typically have higher base rent. Understanding the lease structure helps you compare options accurately and budget appropriately for total occupancy expense.
Revenue-to-rent validation should happen before signing any lease. Estimate your realistic sales potential based on traffic, capacity, average check, and table turns. Then calculate whether your target rent percentage is achievable. If a location requires sales volumes that seem unrealistic for the space or concept, the rent is too high regardless of how attractive the location appears. Conservative revenue projections protect you from overcommitting to a location that looks great but can't support its cost structure.
Lease Terms and Negotiation Considerations
The lease is a long-term commitment that affects your flexibility, costs, and exit options. Understanding key lease provisions helps you negotiate terms that protect your interests and avoid costly surprises.
Lease length and renewal options determine how long you're committed and what happens at the end of the term. According to LoopNet and commercial leasing specialists, initial terms of 5 to 10 years are the industry standard for restaurants, with renewal options extending another 5 to 10 years at predetermined terms. Longer initial terms provide stability but reduce flexibility if the location underperforms. Renewal options give you control over whether to stay, but watch for provisions that reset rent to market rates versus predetermined escalations. Industry consultant Dale Willerton ("The Lease Coach") advises matching your lease term to the time needed to recoup your leasehold improvement investment.
Rent escalation clauses specify how rent increases over the lease term. Fixed annual increases (typically 2% to 3%) provide predictability. Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustments link increases to inflation but can spike unexpectedly. Percentage rent arrangements add a royalty on sales above a certain threshold, aligning landlord and tenant interests but reducing your upside when business is strong. Understand exactly how your rent will increase over the full lease term and factor those increases into long-term financial projections.
Build-out allowances offset some of your construction costs in exchange for lease commitments. According to Cushman & Wakefield's 2024 Office Fit Out Cost Guide, tenant improvement (TI) allowances increased 7% year-over-year in 2024, though they're generally not keeping pace with rising construction costs. TI allowances vary dramatically by market - from baseline amounts around $50 per square foot to $175 or more in premium markets. Restaurants typically require higher buildout costs than standard retail due to specialized kitchen infrastructure. Negotiate aggressively for TI allowances, especially in markets with high vacancy rates, but recognize that larger allowances often require longer lease terms.
Exclusivity clauses prevent the landlord from leasing to direct competitors within the same property. In a shopping center or mixed-use development, exclusivity protects your concept from having an identical restaurant open next door. Landlords resist broad exclusivity provisions, but you should push for protection against direct competitors serving the same cuisine type at similar price points.
Assignment and sublease rights affect your exit options if the location doesn't work out. The ability to assign your lease to a buyer or sublease to another operator provides flexibility and protects you from being trapped in an underperforming location. Landlords typically require approval of assignees but shouldn't unreasonably withhold consent. Understand your exit options before committing.
Zoning, Permits, and Regulatory Requirements
Regulatory requirements can delay openings, add costs, and in some cases make a location completely unusable for your concept. Due diligence on zoning and permitting should happen early in the site selection process.
Zoning verification confirms that restaurant use is permitted at the location. Most commercial zones allow restaurants, but some have restrictions on hours, alcohol service, outdoor seating, or live entertainment. Special use permits may be required for certain features - especially anything involving alcohol, late-night hours, or outdoor dining. Never assume a location is properly zoned simply because other restaurants operate nearby. Verify directly with the local planning department.
Alcohol licensing varies dramatically by jurisdiction. Some areas have limited license quotas that make new licenses nearly impossible to obtain without purchasing an existing license at substantial cost. Other jurisdictions issue licenses more freely but have lengthy approval processes. If alcohol service is central to your concept, research licensing requirements before committing to any location. The inability to obtain a liquor license can doom an otherwise perfect site.
Health department requirements affect your buildout specifications and inspection timeline. Kitchen layouts, ventilation systems, food storage, and restroom facilities must meet local health codes. Some jurisdictions require plan approval before construction begins. Others conduct inspections during buildout with punch lists of items requiring correction before opening. Understand local health department processes and requirements - they directly affect your timeline and buildout cost.
Building codes and inspections cover construction standards, fire safety, occupancy limits, and accessibility. Restaurants typically require multiple inspections during buildout and ongoing compliance with fire safety requirements including suppression systems, hood ventilation, and emergency egress. Historic buildings or adaptive reuse projects often have additional requirements that increase costs and complexity.
Parking requirements are often mandated by zoning code based on restaurant square footage or seating capacity. If a location doesn't have sufficient existing parking to meet code requirements, you may need variance approval or must reduce seating to comply. Parking requirements are sometimes negotiable with planning authorities, especially for urban locations with transit access, but this adds time and uncertainty to the approval process.
Site Selection Scoring Framework
A systematic scoring approach helps you compare locations objectively rather than being swayed by emotional reactions or impressive-sounding but superficial features. Academic research published in the International Review for Spatial Planning (2024) found that multi-criteria decision models using weighted scoring systems provide the most reliable site selection outcomes.
Create weighted criteria that reflect your concept's priorities. A delivery-focused concept might weight delivery access heavily while giving less weight to foot traffic. A destination concept might prioritize parking over pedestrian visibility. The weights should reflect what actually drives success for your specific restaurant, not generic industry averages.
| Criterion: | Description: | Suggested Weight Range: |
| Demographics | Alignment with target customer profile | 15-20% |
| Traffic / Visibility | Foot traffic, vehicle counts, signage exposure | 15-20% |
| Accessibility | Parking, transit, ingress/egress | 10-15% |
| Competition | Market saturation and concept gaps | 10-15% |
| Occupancy Cost | Rent and total occupancy as % of projected sales | 15-20% |
| Lease Terms | Flexibility, TI allowance, restrictions | 5-10% |
| Regulatory | Zoning, licensing, permit timeline | 5-10% |
| Physical Space | Layout efficiency, condition, buildout needs | 5-10% |
Score each location using consistent criteria across all options. Visit each site multiple times, at different times of day and different days of the week. Gather data on traffic counts, competitive density, and demographic profiles. Calculate realistic occupancy cost percentages based on conservative revenue projections. Document your scoring with notes explaining the rationale for each score.
Compare objectively using your weighted scores. The location with the highest total score isn't automatically the winner - scoring illuminates tradeoffs and highlights where locations excel or fall short. A location might score well overall but have a critical weakness (like unacceptable occupancy costs or zoning issues) that disqualifies it despite other strengths.
Trust the process but use judgment. As SCORE advisors note, site selection is "part art and part science" - but science should dominate. Quantitative scoring provides structure and prevents emotional decision-making, but experienced operators also develop instincts about locations that are difficult to quantify. If your gut strongly disagrees with what the numbers say, investigate further. Either you'll discover factors the scoring missed, or you'll confirm that the data is right and your instinct is wrong.
Red Flags and Locations to Avoid
Certain warning signs should give you pause regardless of how attractive a location appears on the surface. Experienced operators learn to recognize these red flags and either negotiate solutions or walk away.
Excessive vacancy in the immediate area suggests fundamental problems with the location or trade area. While some vacancy is normal, a strip center with multiple long-term vacancies indicates either landlord issues, access problems, or declining trade area demographics. Unless you have compelling evidence that you're different from the businesses that failed there, treat high vacancy as a serious warning sign.
Turnover in your specific space is even more concerning than general vacancy. If the same storefront has housed three failed restaurants in five years, something about that specific location isn't working. Perhaps it's visibility, access, layout, or simply a reputation that scares off customers. Whatever the reason, a history of failure should make you extremely cautious.
Landlord reputation and responsiveness matters for the length of your lease. A landlord who is difficult during lease negotiations will likely be difficult when you need maintenance, approvals for modifications, or flexibility on terms. Research landlords by talking to current tenants and checking public records for lawsuits or code violations. A problematic landlord can make even a great location miserable.
Construction and development uncertainty around a site can dramatically change its characteristics. A location that's perfect today might become a construction zone for years if a major development breaks ground next door. Similarly, announced developments that seem positive (new office towers, residential buildings) might be delayed indefinitely or cancelled. Verify the status of any nearby development and understand how it might affect your location.
Overbuilding in the trade area can sneak up on you. The site might look great today, but if there are ten other restaurants under construction within a mile radius, the competitive landscape will be very different by the time you open. Research not just existing competitors but announced and permitted new restaurants that will enter the market.
Frequently Asked Questions
What percentage of my revenue should go to rent?
According to the National Restaurant Association's 2025 data, the median occupancy cost is 5.7% of sales for full-service restaurants and 5.2% for limited-service restaurants. Industry consultants recommend targeting 5% to 8% of gross sales for rent, with total occupancy costs (including CAM, taxes, and insurance) not exceeding 10% of revenue. Urban locations may run slightly higher if the location generates proportionally higher sales volume.
How important is parking for a restaurant?
Parking importance varies by concept and location. Common industry benchmarks suggest one parking space per four seats for sit-down restaurants, or one space per 100 square feet of dining area for fast-food establishments. However, requirements are set by local zoning codes and vary significantly by jurisdiction. Urban locations with strong public transit can operate with less parking but still need loading zones and accessible parking.
Should I choose a location near competitors or away from them?
Both strategies can work depending on circumstances. Clustering near competitors creates a dining destination that draws customers seeking options - beneficial when total demand exceeds supply. Locating away from competitors can work if you're filling an unmet need in an underserved area. Analyze total market demand and competitive density, not just competitor presence, when making this decision.
How do I calculate if I can afford a specific location?
Project realistic sales based on the location's traffic, your concept's capture rate, average check, and seating capacity. Then calculate whether your target rent percentage (5-8% for most concepts) covers the total occupancy cost. If achieving acceptable rent-to-sales ratio requires unrealistic sales volumes, the location is too expensive regardless of how attractive it appears.
What's the difference between primary and secondary trade areas?
Primary trade area (typically 1-3 miles or 5-10 minute drive) contains customers who visit regularly and generates 60-70% of revenue. Research confirms that 85% of restaurant customers live within 3-5 miles. Secondary trade area (3-7 miles) contains occasional visitors who might come for special occasions or when in the area. Focus site selection analysis on primary trade area demographics and traffic.
How early should I research zoning and permits?
Research zoning, alcohol licensing, and major permit requirements before making any financial commitment to a location. A perfect site is worthless if you can't obtain necessary approvals. Zoning verification should happen during initial site evaluation, and detailed permit research should occur before signing a lease.
What lease term length should I negotiate?
Initial terms of 5-10 years are standard for restaurants. Match your lease term to the time needed to recoup your leasehold improvement investment. Shorter terms provide flexibility if the location underperforms but may limit your ability to negotiate tenant improvement allowances. Longer terms provide stability and stronger negotiating position but increase your risk if circumstances change. Always ensure you have renewal options at reasonable terms.
How much should I invest in buildout for a new location?
Buildout costs vary dramatically based on space condition, concept requirements, and local construction costs. Tenant improvement allowances typically range from $50 to $175+ per square foot depending on market conditions. Budget conservatively and negotiate for TI allowances from the landlord. The key question isn't absolute buildout cost but whether total investment can generate acceptable returns given realistic revenue projections.
What happens if my first-choice location falls through?
Maintain a pipeline of 2-3 viable locations rather than fixating on a single option. This gives you negotiating leverage and protects against delays if your first choice has issues. Walking away from a problematic deal is always better than forcing a bad location to work.
How long does the site selection process typically take?
From beginning serious searches to signing a lease, expect 3-6 months for most concepts. Add 4-8 months for permitting and buildout before opening. Rush this timeline at your peril - hasty location decisions create problems that persist for the life of the lease. Build adequate time into your planning for thorough site evaluation and negotiation.
Related Resources
- Restaurant Business Plan Guide - Develop a comprehensive business plan that includes your location strategy and financial projections
- Restaurant Local Listings Guide - Once you've secured your location, optimize your online presence to drive local discovery
- Restaurant Marketing Guide - Build awareness for your new location through strategic marketing initiatives
Share This!